邢望力狱中劳动与体罚指控：家属称每日劳动15小时以上、右手骨折后仍被迫重劳，狱方称只安排剪线头、没有规定劳动任务Family alleges prison labor and punishment of Xing Wangli at Sanmenxia Prison: son says 15-hour workdays and forced heavy labor after a fractured hand; prison says he only trims threads, with no set work quota

🔊 听这篇报道🔊 Listen to this story 中文朗读 · 可转发给家人收听Read aloud in Chinese

据维权网报道（经聚焦中国转载、页面于 2026 年 10 月 25 日恢复可读，媒体标注 10 月 23 日），邢望力的妻子徐金翠 10 月 20 日到河南省三门峡监狱探监后披露，监狱安排邢望力剪线头。该报道另附河南省公共资源交易中心对“三门峡白天鹅服饰”在狱内的采购记录（5 月 28 日、6 月 29 日、8 月 21 日），并自注：这些采购记录可证明企业生产与监狱监管之间的关系，但不证明邢望力本人所做工序或存在强迫超时劳动。MNewsTV 10 月 24 日报道，其子邢俭称，父亲因抓挠皮肤被罚站 5 天、每日劳动 15 小时以上、右手骨折后仍被强迫从事重体力劳动；监狱对家属的答复是“只安排剪线头，没有规定劳动任务”。指控与狱方说法彼此对峙，本站未独立核实，定性为持续核实。[1][2]According to a Rights Defense Network (Weiquanwang) report republished by China Focus (readable again on October 25, media-dated October 23), Xu Jincui visited her husband Xing Wangli at Sanmenxia Prison in Henan on October 20, 2026, and afterwards disclosed that the prison had assigned Xing to trim threads. The report also cites procurement records of the Henan Public Resources Trading Center concerning 'Sanmenxia Bai Tian'e (White Swan) Garments' inside the prison (dated May 28, June 29 and August 21), while noting itself that these records can show a production/supervision relationship but do not prove which tasks Xing himself performed or that he was forced into overtime labor. MNewsTV reported on October 24 that Xing's son Xing Jian said his father had been punished with five days of standing for scratching his skin, worked more than 15 hours a day, and was still forced into heavy physical labor after fracturing his right hand; the prison's reply to the family was that he was 'only assigned to trim threads, with no set work quota.' The family's allegations and the prison's account conflict; this site has not independently verified them, and the record is marked as under ongoing verification. [1][2]

为什么重要WHY IT MATTERS

这条记录值得存档，有三个原因。其一，指控具体而严重：家属给出的不是笼统抱怨，而是可核对的细节——劳动时长（每日 15 小时以上）、处罚方式（因抓挠皮肤罚站 5 天）、伤情（右手骨折后仍被迫重劳）；这类经由探监带出的陈述，是外界了解在押人员处遇的主要渠道之一。其二，报道同时给出了证据的边界：河南省公共资源交易中心的采购记录只能证明“三门峡白天鹅服饰”的生产、采购与监狱监管体系之间存在联系，报道本身明确承认，这不能证明邢望力个人参加了哪道工序、更不能证明强迫超时劳动——把证据能证明什么、不能证明什么分开写，是本案必须守住的尺度。其三，家属与狱方说法直接冲突：一方称超时劳动与体罚，一方称“只安排剪线头，没有规定劳动任务”；在劳动安排记录、考勤、医疗档案与监控等一手材料公开核查之前，任何一方说法都只能归因、不能定论。故本记录定性为持续核实，并将与本站其他案卷严格分离，只记录本案。[1][2]This record is worth keeping for three reasons. First, the allegations are specific and serious: the family offered checkable details rather than general complaints — working hours (more than 15 hours a day), a form of punishment (five days of standing for scratching his skin), and an injury (continued heavy labor after a fractured right hand). Statements carried out through family visits are one of the main channels through which the outside world learns about a prisoner's treatment. Second, the reporting itself marks the limits of its evidence: the Henan Public Resources Trading Center procurement records can only show that 'Sanmenxia Bai Tian'e Garments' had production and procurement ties within the prison's supervision system; the report expressly concedes they do not prove which process Xing personally worked on, let alone forced overtime. Keeping what the evidence can and cannot prove separate is the standard this case requires. Third, the family and the prison flatly contradict each other — overtime labor and punishment on one side, 'only thread-trimming, no work quota' on the other — and until primary materials such as work-assignment records, attendance logs, medical files and surveillance footage are independently examined, neither side's account can be treated as established. This record is therefore marked as under ongoing verification, and is kept strictly separate from all other case files on this site. [1][2]

详细记录Full report

据维权网报道（经聚焦中国转载、页面于 2026 年 10 月 25 日恢复可读，媒体标注 10 月 23 日）：2026 年 10 月 20 日，邢望力的妻子徐金翠到河南省三门峡监狱探望丈夫后对外披露，监狱安排邢望力剪线头。这是目前关于邢望力狱中劳动安排的最早公开陈述，来源为家属探监后转述。[1]

同一篇报道附上了可公开查证的旁证：河南省公共资源交易中心有对“三门峡白天鹅服饰”在狱内的采购记录，日期分别为 5 月 28 日、6 月 29 日、8 月 21 日。报道同时自我设限，明确注明：这些采购记录可以证明企业生产与监狱监管之间的关系，但不证明邢望力本人所从事的工序，也不能证明存在强迫超时劳动。本站采录时保留这一限定，不把采购记录当作超时劳动的证据。[1]

MNewsTV 2026 年 10 月 24 日的报道给出了家属一方更完整的指控：邢望力之子邢俭称，父亲因抓挠皮肤被罚站 5 天，每日劳动 15 小时以上，右手骨折后仍被强迫从事重体力劳动。同一报道中，监狱对家属的答复是“只安排剪线头，没有规定劳动任务”。两方说法在劳动内容、劳动时长与是否存在处罚三点上全面冲突。[2]

核实说明：本记录中的劳动与体罚指控，全部来自邢望力家属（妻子徐金翠、儿子邢俭）的陈述；监狱方面的说法是否认或淡化（只安排剪线头、无劳动任务）。本站没有独立渠道核对邢望力的岗位安排、考勤、处罚与医疗记录，也未获得监狱的正式书面回应，因此不就指控真伪下任何结论。本记录定性为持续核实，后续如有家属进一步申诉、检察机关监督信息或新的独立报道，本站将更新。本案与本站其他记录严格分离，不与其他案卷相互引用或合并叙述。[1][2]

According to the Rights Defense Network (Weiquanwang) report republished by China Focus (readable again on October 25, 2026; media-dated October 23): on October 20, 2026, Xu Jincui visited her husband Xing Wangli at Sanmenxia Prison in Henan Province and afterwards disclosed that the prison had assigned Xing to trim threads. This is the earliest public account of Xing's work assignment in prison, relayed by his wife after the visit. [1]

The same report attached publicly checkable corroboration: procurement records of the Henan Public Resources Trading Center concerning 'Sanmenxia Bai Tian'e (White Swan) Garments' inside the prison, dated May 28, June 29 and August 21. The report also limited itself expressly, noting that these procurement records can prove a relationship between the company's production and the prison's supervision, but do not prove which tasks Xing Wangli himself performed, nor that forced overtime labor took place. This site preserves that qualification and does not treat the procurement records as evidence of overtime labor. [1]

MNewsTV's October 24, 2026 report carried the family's fuller account: Xing's son Xing Jian said his father had been punished with five days of standing for scratching his skin, worked more than 15 hours a day, and was still forced into heavy physical labor after fracturing his right hand. In the same report, the prison's reply to the family was that Xing was 'only assigned to trim threads, with no set work quota.' The two accounts conflict on all three points: the nature of the work, its duration, and whether punishment occurred. [2]

Verification note: every allegation of labor and punishment in this record comes from Xing Wangli's family (his wife Xu Jincui and his son Xing Jian); the prison's position, as relayed to the family, denies or downplays them (thread-trimming only, no work quota). This site has no independent channel to check Xing's work-assignment, attendance, punishment or medical records, and has not received a formal written response from the prison; it therefore draws no conclusion about the truth of the allegations. The record is marked as under ongoing verification and will be updated if the family files further appeals, if prosecutorial supervision information emerges, or if new independent reporting appears. This case is kept strictly separate from other records on this site and is not cross-narrated with any other case file. [1][2]

核实来源

Primary sources

上述链接是所引用报道的原始发布方。其内容已在正文中明确归属，不代表本站独立完成了全部事实认定。Links above point to the original publishers of the cited reports. Their contents are attributed in the text and do not imply that this site has independently verified every factual claim.