明证中国China Rights Record 独立证据与新闻档案Independent evidence desk
← 返回全部记录Back to all records
持续核实Under ongoing verification 律师权利Lawyers' rights
本站发布:2026-10-28 事件日期:2026-10-13Published: 2026-10-28 Event date: 2026-10-13

人权律师卢思位出狱一年后仍遭贴身监控:厦门旅店遭警方查房、成都街头被四人跟踪,妻子称监控“特别严厉”Rights lawyer Lu Siwei still under close surveillance a year after prison release: police check at Xiamen guesthouse, four-man tail in Chengdu; wife says monitoring is 'particularly severe'

🔊 听这篇报道🔊 Listen to this story 中文朗读 · 可转发给家人收听Read aloud in Chinese

对华援助协会(ChinaAid)10 月 27 日报道,中国人权律师卢思位(53 岁)称出狱一年多后仍遭持续监控:10 月 11 日在厦门大嶝岛一家旅店入住后不久,警方即到店核验其身份(据当日发布于 X 的视频);10 月 13 日在成都,四名身份不明者跟踪他,卢思位当面质问坐在车内前排的一人时,对方出言辱骂。卢思位说:“对我的人盯人监控已经恢复了。看来网上流传的维稳方案是真的。他们的监控技术实在太差,我一出门就发现了。”妻子张春晓称,无论丈夫外出还是返回成都,监控与骚扰都在加剧,且对卢思位的监控“特别严厉”。[1]ChinaAid reported on October 27, 2026 that Chinese human rights lawyer Lu Siwei, 53, says surveillance has continued more than a year after his release from prison: on October 11, police visited his guesthouse on Dadeng Island, Xiamen, Fujian Province, to verify his identity shortly after he checked in (according to a video posted to X that day); on October 13 in Chengdu, Sichuan Province, four unidentified individuals followed him, and one verbally abused him when Lu confronted the person in the front seat of their vehicle. Lu said: 'The person-to-person surveillance of me has resumed. It seems the stability-maintenance plan circulating online is real. Their surveillance skills are just so poor that I noticed them as soon as I stepped outside.' His wife Zhang Chunxiao said authorities have intensified their surveillance and harassment of her husband, both when he travels outside Chengdu and when he returns, and described the monitoring of Lu as particularly severe. [1]

为什么重要WHY IT MATTERS

这起事件值得记录,有四个原因。其一,它呈现的是“出狱不等于自由”的完整链条:卢思位 2025 年 8 月刑满出狱,但仍被禁止出境、日常出行遭贴身跟踪、旅店入住即遭查房——刑罚执行完毕后,行政性监控无缝接续,这是中国人权律师群体出狱后处境的典型样本。其二,时间线本身具有证据价值:4 月成都酒店跟踪事件中,跟监者自称是政府安排的“帮教”;9 月底成华区法院从其银行账户直接扣划 1 万元罚金,卢思位认为这是对其投诉官员的报复;10 月两起事件相隔仅两天、横跨福建与四川两省,说明监控不是单次偶发,而是有组织的跨地域跟随。其三,卢思位的个案分量重:他曾代理“香港 12 人”案、“六四酒案”、余文生、王藏等敏感案件,被同行称为“律师的律师”,2021 年被吊销执业证、2023 年在老挝被捕遣返的经历曾引发国际关注;对他的持续监控,折射的是整个维权律师群体出狱后的生存空间。其四,需要保守对待的边界同样清楚:跟踪者的身份、监控指令的来源均未获官方证实,卢思位对官员滥权的投诉内容(点名四川省长、成都市长、市公安局长、市中院院长)是其个人指控、原文已明言“未经独立证实”;本记录只记录对华援助的报道与当事人的陈述,不把指控写成已认定的事实,故定性为持续核实。[1]This episode is worth recording for four reasons. First, it shows the full chain of 'release does not mean freedom': Lu was released in August 2025, yet remains banned from leaving China, is tailed on the street, and faces police identity checks when he checks into a guesthouse — administrative surveillance seamlessly succeeding the completed prison term, a typical pattern for released rights lawyers in China. Second, the timeline itself carries evidentiary value: in the April Chengdu hotel tail, one follower described the surveillance as government-mandated 'assistance and education'; in late September, the Chenghua District Court in Chengdu deducted the 10,000-yuan fine directly from Lu's bank account, which Lu believes was retaliation for complaints he filed against officials; the two October incidents, two days apart and spanning Fujian and Sichuan, indicate organised cross-regional following rather than an isolated encounter. Third, Lu's profile gives the case weight: he represented the 'Hong Kong 12' case, the 'June 4th Liquor Case', and defenders Yu Wensheng and Wang Zang, is known among peers as a 'lawyer's lawyer', lost his licence in 2021, and was arrested in Laos and deported in 2023 in a case that drew international attention — continued surveillance of him reflects the living space left to the whole rights-lawyer community after release. Fourth, the conservative boundaries are equally clear: the followers' identities and the source of any surveillance orders are unconfirmed by officials, and Lu's complaints against officials (naming the Sichuan governor, the Chengdu mayor, the Chengdu public security chief and the Chengdu intermediate court president) are his personal allegations, expressly flagged by the source as 'not independently established'; this record reports only ChinaAid's reporting and the parties' statements, not the allegations as established facts, hence 'under ongoing verification'. [1]

详细记录Full report

据对华援助 10 月 27 日报道,卢思位称本月两起事件标志着贴身监控的恢复:10 月 11 日,他在福建厦门大嶝岛一家旅店入住后不久,警方即到店核验其身份,相关视频当日发布于 X;10 月 13 日在成都,他发现四人坐在车内跟踪自己,当面质问前排一人时,对方出言辱骂。卢思位说:“对我的人盯人监控已经恢复了。看来网上流传的维稳方案是真的。他们的监控技术实在太差,我一出门就发现了。”他还对辱骂者说:“你放心,你的脸我已经记住了。”[1]

妻子张春晓说,当局对丈夫的监控与骚扰一直在加剧,无论他外出还是返回成都;虽然其他人权律师也面临类似限制,但对卢思位的监控“特别严厉”。由于在成都没有固定住所,卢思位有时住酒店;他与妻子说,政府人员持续监视其行踪,造成很大的心理压力,使日常生活越来越困难。这与 4 月成都酒店跟踪事件相衔接:当时两名男子跟踪卢思位,其中一人称监控是政府安排的“帮教”。[1]

卢思位的律师生涯与遭打压经历是理解本案的背景:他曾代理“香港 12 人”案(涉及民主活动人士)、“六四酒案”,以及维权人士余文生、王藏的案件。2021 年 1 月,四川省司法厅以其在网上发表的言论为由吊销其律师执业证。2023 年 7 月 28 日,老挝警方在他经泰国赴美与家人团聚途中将其逮捕;同年 9 月他被遣返中国并遭羁押。2025 年 4 月,中国法院以“非法越境”罪判处他 11 个月有期徒刑、罚金 1 万元(约 1400 美元);同年 8 月出狱后,他仍被限制出境,且一直主张该判决出于政治动机、要求推翻原判。[1]

出狱后的经济与医疗压力同样被报道提及:对华援助曾于 2025 年 10 月报道,卢思位被诊断患有早期肺癌,却无法前往美国与妻女团聚;9 月底,成都成华区法院从其银行账户扣划了 1 万元罚金,妻子称此举是报复。2025 年 7 月,在长期被限制出境、且法院拒绝受理其行政诉讼后,卢思位正式投诉四川省、成都市高级官员,指控其滥用职权、违法——被点名的官员包括四川省长施小琳、成都市长陈书平、成都市公安局长胡国民、成都市中级人民法院院长杨诚;原文明确说明,这些指控反映的是卢思位的投诉内容,“未经独立证实”。[1]

核实说明与本站关联:本记录的核心事实——10 月 11 日厦门查房、10 月 13 日成都四人跟踪、妻子关于监控加剧的说法、4 月“帮教”跟踪、罚金扣划与 7 月官员投诉——均来自对华援助 10 月 27 日的单篇报道;跟踪者身份与监控指令来源未获官方证实,官员滥权指控系卢思位个人陈述,本记录全程保留归属。9 月卢思位与其他六名律师联署质疑三名未登记教会领袖案件程序违法一事,与本站 10 月 20 日收录的西安锡安教会律师遭警方阻拦事件属同一批律师群体的不同事件(西安事件发生于 9 月 15 日庭前会议、10 月 20 日见报,已超本轮 24 小时窗口,本轮不另立条)。本记录定性为持续核实,将继续跟进卢思位的上诉、投诉与监控状况。[1]

According to ChinaAid on October 27, Lu said two incidents this month marked the resumption of person-to-person surveillance: on October 11, police arrived to verify his identity shortly after he checked into a guesthouse on Dadeng Island in Xiamen, Fujian Province, according to a video posted to X that day; on October 13 in Chengdu, he spotted four people sitting inside a vehicle following him, and when he confronted someone in the front seat, the individual verbally abused him. Lu said: 'The person-to-person surveillance of me has resumed. It seems the stability-maintenance plan circulating online is real. Their surveillance skills are just so poor that I noticed them as soon as I stepped outside.' To the man who cursed at him, he said: 'Don't worry — I've already memorized your face.' [1]

His wife Zhang Chunxiao said authorities have intensified their surveillance and harassment of her husband, both when he travels outside Chengdu and when he returns; although other human rights lawyers face similar restrictions, she described the monitoring of Lu as particularly severe. Without a permanent residence in Chengdu, Lu sometimes stays in hotels; he and his wife say government personnel continue to monitor his movements, creating significant psychological pressure and making everyday life increasingly difficult. This connects with the April Chengdu hotel incident, when two men followed Lu and one reportedly described the surveillance as government-mandated 'assistance and education'. [1]

Lu's legal career and suppression history frame the case: he previously represented clients in several high-profile cases, including the 'Hong Kong 12' case involving pro-democracy activists and the 'June 4th Liquor Case', as well as rights defenders Yu Wensheng and Wang Zang. In January 2021, the Sichuan Provincial Department of Justice revoked his licence to practise law following statements he published online. On July 28, 2023, Lao police arrested him as he attempted to travel through Thailand to the United States to reunite with his family; he was deported to China in September 2023 and detained. In April 2025, a Chinese court sentenced him to 11 months in prison and fined him 10,000 yuan (approximately $1,400) for illegally crossing the national border; although released in August 2025, he remained subject to restrictions on his movement, including a ban on leaving China, and maintains that his conviction was politically motivated and continues to appeal for the judgment to be overturned. [1]

Post-release financial and medical pressures were also reported: ChinaAid reported in October 2025 that Lu had been diagnosed with early-stage lung cancer and was unable to travel to the United States, where his wife and daughter live; in late September, the Chenghua District Court in Chengdu deducted the 10,000-yuan fine from Lu's bank account, according to his wife. In July, after prolonged restrictions on overseas travel and what he described as a court's refusal to accept his administrative lawsuit, Lu submitted formal complaints accusing senior provincial and city officials of abusing their authority and violating the law — naming Sichuan Governor Shi Xiaolin, Chengdu Mayor Chen Shuping, Chengdu Public Security Bureau Director Hu Guomin, and Chengdu Intermediate People's Court President Yang Cheng; the source expressly notes that these allegations 'have not been independently established'. [1]

Verification note and links to this site's records: the core facts — the October 11 Xiamen identity check, the October 13 Chengdu four-man tail, the wife's account of intensifying monitoring, the April 'assistance and education' tail, the fine deduction and the July complaints against officials — all come from ChinaAid's single October 27 report; the followers' identities and the source of any surveillance orders are unconfirmed by officials, and the abuse-of-authority complaints are Lu's personal allegations, with attribution preserved throughout this record. Lu's September joint action with six other lawyers challenging alleged legal violations in the prosecution of three unregistered-church leaders is a separate episode from the Xi'an Zion Church lawyers' confrontation at the September 15 pretrial conference (reported October 20, outside this round's 24-hour window, so no separate record this round), though it involves the same group of lawyers. This record is graded 'under ongoing verification' and will follow Lu's appeals, complaints and surveillance situation. [1]

上述链接是所引用报告或文章的原始发布方。其结论已在正文中明确归属,不代表本站独立完成了全部事实认定。Links above point to the original publishers of the cited reports or articles. Their conclusions are attributed in the text and do not imply that this site has independently verified every factual claim.