五中全会前夕维稳升级：高瑜称住所外有人“上岗”值守，叶红霞、林春芬、赵永红报告遭围堵限制出行Stability measures tighten ahead of Fifth Plenum: Gao Yu reports guards 'posted' outside her home; Ye Hongxia, Lin Chunfen and Zhao Yonghong report blockades and confinement

背景：中共二十届五中全会将于 10 月 26 日至 29 日在北京召开。北京民众向 MNewsTV 披露，今年的维稳行动提前启动、力度显著增强，维权人士普遍遭遇围堵、监控及出行限制。[2]

高瑜：北京独立记者高瑜 10 月 13 日表示，国庆假期结束后，她的住所附近便有人值守，监控人员在室外轮班，甚至需要有人送饭。相关报道显示，这类由人员在住所附近守候、以限制或监视特定人士活动的安排，被当事人称为“上岗”。[1]

叶红霞、林春芬、赵永红：据 MNewsTV 10 月 16 日报道，10 月 13 日，三人在赵永红住所楼下遭政府人员及保安粗暴拦截；赵永红称，对方未出示任何拘禁手续，仅以“领导指示”为由要求其居家隔离。10 月 19 日综述补充：赵永红称 10 月 12 日起她与 80 多岁的父母即被限制在家中，13 日外出时又遭拦截，保安一度没有及时送来饭食，多次报警未得到有效回应，最后只能打开窗户呼救。10 月 16 日报道还称，10 月 14 日赵永红与父母被恩济庄派出所限制居家、无法正常饮食，她深夜从窗户呼救抗议非法拘禁，并提出三项诉求：解除非法拘禁、追究警察责任、要求赔偿。[1][2]

林春芬：据报道，她长期被限制外出，出门即有警察及保安跟踪。9 月 22 日，她前往北京高院登记案件时遭小红门派出所保安殴打致伤，报警后未获立案。9 月 28 日深夜，她尝试从三楼窗户逃离，最终在二环桥下躲藏；中关村派出所所长率二十多人搜查其朋友住所及“访民村”，最终在树林中将其找到。林春芬称，她遭到三位副所长及海淀分局一位领导的暴力对待。[2] 10 月 19 日综述则称，林春芬此前前往北京高院登记案件时遭保安殴打，报警后没有获得她期待的处理。[1]

于凯：山东律师于凯 10 月 14 日向国家医疗保障局提交《关于建立大病免费医疗保障并逐步推进全民基本医疗免费制度的建议书》，建议先针对重大疾病患者及经济困难群体建立进一步的费用保障机制，再逐步扩大保障范围（据维权网等媒体报道）。于凯此前曾参与提出废除寻衅滋事罪的立法建议；2024 年，青岛市司法局以“违规炒作案件”为由对其作出停止执业一年的行政处罚，并责令其所在律师事务所停业整顿六个月；他于 2025 年恢复执业后，继续提出涉及公共政策的建议。[1]

肇庆火灾赔偿与欠薪：10 月 12 日，广东肇庆高要区金利镇肇星电镀升级环保产业园的工人和工厂经营者聚集镇政府前，要求解决火灾赔偿及拖欠工资问题。据工劳网报道，园区于 2025 年 8 月 15 日发生火灾，多家工厂受到严重损毁。受灾经营者认为，起火企业在危险化学品存放和应急处置方面存在问题，园区在规划、建设、消防和日常管理方面也可能存在责任。MNewsTV 指出，上述说法属于受灾方提出的指控，具体责任仍需结合消防调查、事故鉴定及相关法律程序确认；火灾造成停产后，赔偿责任迟迟未明确，受灾企业难以恢复经营，工人也因欠薪陷入困境，原本属于事故责任认定与民事赔偿的问题，逐渐演变为集体向政府寻求解决的事件。[1]

核实说明：本记录内容主要来自当事人陈述，经 MNewsTV 10 月 16 日、10 月 19 日两篇报道转述（人民报 10 月 18 日亦有类似转述）。MNewsTV 在综述中明确指出，上述细节主要来自当事人陈述及相关媒体报道，尚不能将每项指控都视为已经经过独立调查确认的事实。截至本记录发布，未见中国官方就上述个案作出公开回应，本站亦无法独立核实住所值守、拦截与限制居家的具体情节。本站按指控归因原则，只记录具名当事人公开发出报告这一事实，不就个别指控的真伪作判断，定性为持续核实，并将继续跟进五中全会期间及会后的情况。[1][2]

Background: The Fifth Plenum of the 20th CCP Central Committee will be held in Beijing on October 26-29. Beijing residents told MNewsTV that this year's stability-maintenance operation began early and is markedly stronger, with rights defenders generally facing blockades, surveillance and travel restrictions. [2]

Gao Yu: Beijing independent journalist Gao Yu said on October 13 that, since the end of the National Day holiday, people have been posted near her home, with monitors working outdoor shifts and even having meals delivered to them. Reports describe this practice — personnel stationed near a residence to restrict or monitor a specific individual — as what those targeted call 'being posted' (上岗). [1]

Ye Hongxia, Lin Chunfen and Zhao Yonghong: According to MNewsTV's October 16 report, the three were roughly intercepted by government personnel and security guards outside Zhao Yonghong's residence on October 13; Zhao said no detention paperwork was shown and that she was told to isolate at home solely on 'leadership instructions.' The October 19 roundup adds Zhao's account that she and her parents, both in their eighties, had been restricted to their home since October 12, were intercepted again when going out on October 13, that security staff at one point failed to deliver meals on time, that repeated calls to police brought no effective response, and that she finally opened a window and shouted for help. The October 16 report also says that on October 14 Zhao and her parents were confined at home by the Enjizhuang police station and could not eat normally; late at night she called out from the window in protest against illegal detention, raising three demands: end the illegal detention, hold the police accountable, and pay compensation. [1][2]

Lin Chunfen: She reportedly faces strict monitoring and long-term restrictions on going out, with police and security guards following her whenever she leaves. On September 22, when she went to register a case at the Beijing High Court, she was beaten and injured by security guards of the Xiaohongmen police station; her police report was not accepted for filing. Late on September 28 she tried to slip out through a third-floor window and hid beneath the Second Ring Road bridge; the chief of the Zhongguancun police station led more than twenty people to search her friends' homes and the 'petitioners' village,' eventually finding her in a wooded area. Lin says she was violently treated by three deputy station chiefs and a leader from the Haidian branch bureau. [2] The October 19 roundup states that Lin was beaten by security guards when registering her case at the Beijing High Court and that reporting it to police did not bring the handling she had expected. [1]

Yu Kai: Shandong lawyer Yu Kai submitted a 'Proposal on establishing free medical coverage for major illnesses and progressively advancing universal basic free medical care' to the National Healthcare Security Administration on October 14, recommending stronger cost protection first for major-illness patients and financially struggling groups before gradually expanding coverage (as reported by Rights Defense Network and other outlets). Yu had earlier joined a legislative proposal to abolish the crime of 'picking quarrels and provoking trouble'; in 2024 the Qingdao Municipal Bureau of Justice suspended his practice for one year for 'improperly hyping cases' and ordered his law firm to halt operations for six months for rectification. After resuming practice in 2025, he continued to put forward public-policy proposals. [1]

Zhaoqing fire compensation and wage arrears: On October 12, workers and factory operators from the Zhaoxing Electroplating Upgraded Environmental Industrial Park in Jinli Town, Gaoyao District, Zhaoqing, Guangdong, gathered in front of the township government demanding resolution of fire compensation and unpaid wages. According to the labor outlet Gonglaowang (工劳网), a fire on August 15, 2025 severely damaged multiple factories in the park. Affected operators hold that the enterprise where the fire started had problems in hazardous-chemical storage and emergency response, and that the park may bear responsibility in planning, construction, fire safety and daily management. MNewsTV notes these are allegations by the affected parties, that specific responsibility awaits the fire investigation, accident appraisal and related legal procedures, and that with compensation responsibility undetermined for over a year, affected businesses cannot resume operations and workers have fallen into hardship over unpaid wages — turning what began as accident-liability and civil-compensation questions into collective petitioning of the government. [1]

Verification note: The content of this record comes mainly from the individuals' own accounts, relayed by MNewsTV's October 16 and October 19 reports (the People's Daily-style outlet Renminbao carried a similar account on October 18). MNewsTV states explicitly in its roundup that the details come mainly from the parties' statements and related media reports and that not every allegation can be regarded as independently investigated and confirmed. As of this record, no public response from Chinese officials on these cases has been seen, and this site cannot independently verify the specifics of the home watches, interceptions and confinements. Following this site's attribution principle for allegations, this record documents only the fact that named individuals publicly reported these experiences and makes no judgment on the truth of individual claims; it is graded 'under ongoing verification' and will follow developments during and after the Plenum. [1][2]