贾榀刑满获释后披露豫西监狱劳动经历：称每天劳动逾十小时，点名杭州泰普森公司与监狱有生产合作After completing his sentence, Jia Pin discloses Yuxi Prison labor account: alleges workdays of over ten hours and names Hangzhou Taipu in alleged prison production cooperation
据权利运动等媒体 10 月 13 日报道、MNewsTV 10 月 19 日综述转述，今年 9 月刑满获释的人权捍卫者贾榀表示，他在河南豫西监狱服刑期间每天被安排超过十小时的高强度劳动，监狱伙食和生活条件较差，部分服刑人员的健康受到影响；他还指称，杭州泰普森公司与相关监狱存在生产合作，服刑人员参与制作包袋等户外用品。贾榀因翻墙发帖被判刑四年一案，本站 10 月 7 日已有经司法文书核对的记录；本次披露属其获释后的个人陈述，未见独立材料印证，被点名的企业与监狱方面未见公开回应，本记录定性为持续核实。[1]According to Rights Movement and other outlets on October 13, relayed in MNewsTV's October 19 roundup, rights defender Jia Pin — released this September after completing his sentence — says that while imprisoned at Henan's Yuxi Prison he was assigned more than ten hours of high-intensity labor daily, that prison food and living conditions were poor, and that some prisoners' health was affected. He also alleges that Hangzhou Taipu Co. had production cooperation with the prison concerned and that prisoners took part in making bags and other outdoor products. Jia's four-year sentence for his VPN social-media posts was recorded by this site on October 7 against judicial documents; the present disclosure is his post-release personal account, with no independent corroborating materials seen and no public response from the named company or the prison authorities. This record is graded 'under ongoing verification'. [1]
为什么重要WHY IT MATTERS
这条披露值得单独记录。其一，披露者是刚刚刑满获释的具名当事人，讲述的是其本人服刑场所的劳动安排，而非二手传闻；其二，他直接点名了一家有公开出口业务的户外用品企业集团，指称监狱服刑人员为其生产包袋等产品——若指称属实，问题就不止于监狱内部管理，还涉及服刑人员的基本劳动条件、人格尊严，以及企业对供应链中监狱生产环节的审查责任；其三，这与本站持续跟踪的监狱劳动议题直接相关（本站 10 月 11 日曾记录江西肖高升举报吉安监狱强迫劳动一案）。但必须保守说明：目前证据仅有贾榀的个人陈述及媒体转载，劳动时长、劳动报酬、生产订单、企业与监狱之间的合同关系均无公开文件可供核对，是否存在强迫劳动更需独立调查；企业与监狱方面均未见回应。本站因此按“某某披露某某”的归因方式记录披露本身，不就指控真伪作判断。[1]This disclosure merits its own record. First, the speaker is a named individual just released from the very prison whose labor arrangements he describes — a first-hand account rather than a second-hand rumor. Second, he names a specific outdoor-products group with public export business, alleging that prison inmates produced bags and similar goods for it; if true, the issue goes beyond internal prison management to prisoners' basic labor conditions and human dignity, and to corporate responsibility for auditing prison links in supply chains. Third, it connects directly to the prison-labor beat this site tracks (on October 11 this site recorded Xiao Gaosheng's report alleging forced labor at Ji'an Prison in Jiangxi). A conservative caveat is essential: the evidence so far is Jia's personal account as re-reported by media — working hours, pay, production orders and the contractual relationship between company and prison are documented by no public files available for checking, whether forced labor occurred would require independent investigation, and neither the company nor the prison authorities have publicly responded. This site therefore records the disclosure itself in attributed form ('Jia Pin discloses/alleges…') and makes no judgment on the truth of the allegations. [1]
详细记录Full report
背景（与本站既有记录的衔接）：贾榀，1989 年生，河南省南阳市卧龙区居民，因 2014 年至 2022 年间使用“翻墙”工具登录 Facebook、Twitter 等境外平台发布信息，被南阳市卧龙区人民法院以寻衅滋事罪判处有期徒刑四年，2026 年 9 月 21 日刑满释放。其释放证明书（(2026)豫西释证字第428号）载明服刑执行地点为河南豫西监狱。该案的起诉书、判决书与释放证明书照片经当事人本人公开，本站核对案号、日期与刑期相互吻合，已于 2026 年 10 月 7 日立为“已核实记录”（见本站记录“河南南阳贾榀翻墙发帖被以寻衅滋事罪判刑四年，2026年9月刑满释放”）。本条记录的是他获释后作出的新披露，与前条的定性相互独立。
披露内容：权利运动等媒体 10 月 13 日报道，贾榀今年 9 月刑满获释后表示，服刑期间每天被安排超过十小时的高强度劳动，监狱伙食和生活条件较差，部分服刑人员健康受到影响。[1]
点名企业：贾榀指称，杭州泰普森公司与相关监狱存在生产合作，服刑人员参与制作包袋等户外用品。MNewsTV 综述同时指出，泰普森集团的公开资料显示，该集团从事户外休闲用品的设计、开发、生产和出口，并在多个国家和地区布局生产业务；但企业从事户外用品生产这一事实，本身并不能证明其参与监狱强迫劳动，企业公开介绍拥有生产基地，也不能单独回答具体订单是否曾交由监狱生产。[1]
核实说明：MNewsTV 在综述中明确指出，上述指控目前主要来自贾榀的个人陈述及转载报道；关于具体劳动安排、劳动报酬、生产订单、企业与监狱之间的合同关系，以及是否存在强迫劳动，仍需要监狱记录、企业文件、供应链资料和独立调查进一步核实，截至该报道撰写时，尚未获得足以独立确认上述全部指控的公开材料。截至本记录发布，未见杭州泰普森公司、豫西监狱或司法行政机关就此作出公开回应。本站按指控归因原则记录披露本身，不就指控真伪作判断，定性为持续核实，将继续跟进企业与官方的回应及其他独立信源。[1]
Background (link to this site's existing record): Jia Pin, born in 1989, a resident of Wolong District, Nanyang, Henan, was sentenced by the Wolong District People's Court to four years in prison for 'picking quarrels and provoking trouble' over posts he made between 2014 and 2022 on Facebook, Twitter and other overseas platforms accessed via VPN tools; he was released on September 21, 2026, on completion of his sentence. His release certificate (Yuxi Release Certificate [2026] No. 428) shows he served the sentence at Henan's Yuxi Prison. Photos of the indictment, verdict and release certificate were published by Jia himself; this site cross-checked the case numbers, dates and sentence against one another and established a 'verified record' on October 7, 2026 (see this site's record: 'Nanyang man sentenced to four years for VPN social media posts, released September 2026'). The present record documents his new post-release disclosure and is graded independently of that earlier record.
The disclosure: Rights Movement and other outlets reported on October 13 that, after his release in September, Jia Pin said he had been assigned more than ten hours of high-intensity labor every day during his imprisonment, that prison food and living conditions were poor, and that some prisoners' health had been affected. [1]
The named company: Jia alleges that Hangzhou Taipu Co. had production cooperation with the prison concerned and that prisoners took part in making bags and other outdoor products. MNewsTV's roundup notes at the same time that Taipu Group's public materials show it designs, develops, manufactures and exports outdoor leisure products, with production operations in multiple countries and regions — but that a company making outdoor products does not in itself prove participation in prison forced labor, and publicly described production bases cannot by themselves answer whether specific orders were ever produced in a prison. [1]
Verification note: MNewsTV states expressly in its roundup that the allegations above rest mainly on Jia Pin's personal account and re-reporting; that the specific labor arrangements, labor pay, production orders, the contractual relationship between the company and the prison, and whether forced labor occurred, all require prison records, company documents, supply-chain materials and independent investigation; and that, as of its report, no publicly available materials sufficed to independently confirm all the allegations. As of this record, no public response from Hangzhou Taipu Co., Yuxi Prison or the judicial-administrative authorities has been seen. Following this site's attribution principle for allegations, this record documents the disclosure itself and makes no judgment on the truth of the claims; it is graded 'under ongoing verification' and will follow any response from the company or officials and any further independent sourcing. [1]
上述链接是所引用报告或评估的原始发布方。其结论已在正文中明确归属，不代表本站独立完成了全部事实认定。Links above point to the original publishers of the cited reports or assessments. Their conclusions are attributed in the text and do not imply that this site has independently verified every factual claim.