中国驻荷兰使馆致函荷兰议会外委会、要求不给藏人行政中央司政彭巴次仁提供平台：信函称藏人行政中央为违宪“分裂政治组织”，议会会晤是否举行尚未证实Chinese Embassy in The Hague wrote to the Dutch Parliament's Foreign Affairs Committee asking it not to give CTA leader Penpa Tsering a platform, calling the CTA an unconstitutional 'separatist political organisation'; whether the committee meeting took place is unconfirmed
据《西藏快讯》2026 年 11 月 6 日报道，藏人行政中央司政彭巴次仁 11 月 3 日抵达荷兰海牙进行正式访问期间，中国驻海牙使馆于 11 月 4 日致函荷兰议会外交事务委员会成员，对司政与该委员会的既定会晤表示关切，要求议员不要给彭巴次仁提供平台；信函称藏人行政中央为违宪的“分裂政治组织”、谋求“西藏独立”，称西藏纯属中国“内政”，并援引中方在西藏的基础设施投资与经济增长、坚称没有任何国家承认西藏独立。尽管中方提出异议，司政仍按计划继续在海牙的活动：11 月 4 日会见荷兰政府负责宗教自由事务的高级官员，并与当地记者及中国问题评论员（包括前驻华记者 Garrie van Pinxteren）举行媒体圆桌；11 月 5 日在第六届对华政策跨国议会联盟（IPAC）年度峰会上发表主旨演讲，52 名议员、30 国代表与会。彭巴次仁在演讲中重申藏人行政中央坚持中间道路、寻求与北京对话并不减损西藏的历史与法律权利，呼吁各国政府以立法措施反击中方历史叙事（援引美国《促进解决藏中冲突法案》），并反对北京试图控制包括第十四世达赖喇嘛转世在内的藏传佛教精神领袖转世认定。访问期间他还会见了 IPAC 联合主席扬·帕特诺特、欧洲议会议员米丽娅姆·莱克斯曼及巴拿马、日本、台湾、英国、罗马尼亚与巴尔干代表团。荷兰议会官方日程原定 11 月 5 日安排彭巴次仁与外委会会晤，但截至《西藏快讯》发稿，藏人行政中央官网尚未证实该会晤是否在中方干预后举行。本记录依据单一新闻来源，信函原文未经独立核对、会晤结果尚待证实，故定性为持续核实。[1]According to Tibet Express on November 6, 2026, while Central Tibetan Administration (CTA) President (Sikyong) Penpa Tsering was on an official visit to The Hague, having arrived on November 3, the Chinese Embassy in The Hague wrote on November 4 directly to members of the Dutch Parliament's Committee on Foreign Affairs, expressing concern over his scheduled meeting with the committee and urging members not to provide Penpa Tsering with a platform; the letter labelled the CTA an unconstitutional 'separatist political organisation' pursuing 'Tibet independence', maintained that Tibet is strictly an 'internal matter' of China, and cited Beijing's infrastructure investments and economic growth while asserting that no country recognises Tibetan independence. Despite Beijing's objections, the Sikyong continued with his scheduled engagements: on November 4 he met with senior Dutch government officials on religious freedom and took part in a media roundtable with local journalists and China commentators, including former correspondent Garrie van Pinxteren; on November 5 he delivered a keynote address at the sixth annual summit of the Inter-Parliamentary Alliance on China (IPAC), where 52 parliamentarians representing 30 countries gathered. In his address, Penpa Tsering reaffirmed the CTA's commitment to the Middle Way Approach, emphasising that pursuing dialogue with Beijing did not diminish Tibet's historical and legal rights, urged foreign governments to counter China's historical narrative through legislative measures, citing the United States' Resolve Tibet Act, and called for international opposition to Beijing's attempts to assert control over the selection and reincarnation of Tibetan Buddhist spiritual leaders, including the future reincarnation of the 14th Dalai Lama. During his visit he also held bilateral meetings with IPAC Co-Chair Jan Paternotte, Member of the European Parliament Miriam Lexmann, and delegations from Panama, Japan, Taiwan, the United Kingdom, Romania and the Balkans. While the Dutch Parliament's official schedule listed a meeting between Penpa Tsering and the Committee on Foreign Affairs for November 5, reports published on Tibet.net had not, at the time of writing, confirmed whether the meeting took place following the Chinese Embassy's intervention. This record rests on a single news source; the letter's text has not been independently checked and the meeting's outcome is unconfirmed, hence under ongoing verification. [1]
为什么重要WHY IT MATTERS
这封信值得记录，有三个原因。其一，施压的对象变了：以往本站记录的跨境镇压针对的是异见者本人——米兰检方侦结的“李老师”跟监案、云师在加拿大遭中国诉讼文书送达、Wanying Zhang 在美国被 FBI 逮捕；这次使馆直接向另一国议会的委员会发函、要求取消既定会晤，干预的目标是外国立法机构自身的议程。其二，信函的措辞本身就是记录：“违宪的分裂政治组织”“纯属内政”“没有任何国家承认西藏独立”——中方把一套主权话语直接递到外国议员手里，要求对方按这套话语行事；这与本站记录的《促进民族团结进步法》第 63 条域外适用争议属于同一条线索：国内法与主权主张正在向境外延伸。其三，施压的结果耐人寻味：司政的其余活动照常进行——会见荷兰官员、媒体圆桌、IPAC 峰会主旨演讲与多场双边会晤均未受阻；但最关键的议会外委会会晤是否举行，截至发稿尚未证实——这场干预成败与否，本身就是后续跟进的看点。[1]This letter is worth recording for three reasons. First, the target of the pressure has shifted: the transnational repression this site has documented has targeted dissidents themselves — the Milan prosecutors' probe into the harassment of 'Teacher Li', the service of Chinese court documents on Gyal Lo in Canada, and the FBI arrest of Wanying Zhang in the United States; here an embassy wrote directly to a foreign parliament's committee asking it to cancel a scheduled meeting, with the intervention aimed at the foreign legislature's own agenda. Second, the letter's language is itself part of the record: an 'unconstitutional separatist political organisation', a strictly 'internal matter', 'no country recognises Tibetan independence' — Beijing handing its sovereignty vocabulary directly to foreign parliamentarians and asking them to act on it; this belongs to the same thread as the extraterritorial application of Article 63 of the Law on Promoting Ethnic Unity and Progress, which this site has recorded. Third, the outcome is genuinely ambiguous: the Sikyong's other engagements went ahead as planned — meetings with Dutch officials, the media roundtable, the IPAC keynote and a series of bilateral meetings — but whether the key committee meeting itself took place remains unconfirmed at the time of writing, and whether the intervention succeeded or failed is itself the follow-up question. [1]
详细记录Full report
据《西藏快讯》11 月 6 日报道：藏人行政中央司政彭巴次仁 11 月 3 日抵达荷兰海牙进行正式访问。11 月 4 日，即司政抵达次日，中国驻海牙使馆直接致函荷兰议会外交事务委员会成员，对司政与该委员会的既定会晤表示关切。信函要求委员会成员不要给彭巴次仁提供平台，称藏人行政中央为违宪的“分裂政治组织”、谋求“西藏独立”；信函坚称西藏严格属于中国的“内政”，援引中方在西藏的基础设施投资与经济增长，并称没有任何国家承认西藏独立。尽管中方提出异议，司政仍按计划继续在海牙的活动：11 月 4 日会见荷兰政府负责宗教自由事务的高级官员，并与当地记者及中国问题评论员举行媒体圆桌，其中包括前驻华记者 Garrie van Pinxteren。[1]
访问期间的外交活动还包括：11 月 5 日，彭巴次仁在第六届对华政策跨国议会联盟（IPAC）年度峰会上发表主旨演讲，52 名议员、30 国代表与会。他在演讲中重申藏人行政中央坚持中间道路，强调寻求与北京对话并不减损西藏的历史与法律权利；呼吁各国政府以立法措施反击中方历史叙事，并援引美国《促进解决藏中冲突法案》为例；同时呼吁国际社会反对北京试图控制藏传佛教精神领袖转世认定的做法，包括未来第十四世达赖喇嘛的转世。访问期间他还会见了 IPAC 联合主席扬·帕特诺特、欧洲议会议员米丽娅姆·莱克斯曼，以及巴拿马、日本、台湾、英国、罗马尼亚与巴尔干代表团。[1]
核实说明：本记录的唯一来源是《西藏快讯》11 月 6 日的报道；使馆信函的原文未公开，本站未独立核对信函措辞，报道中对信函内容的转述以《西藏快讯》为准。荷兰议会官方日程原定 11 月 5 日安排彭巴次仁与外交事务委员会会晤，但截至《西藏快讯》发稿，藏人行政中央官网尚未证实该会晤是否在中方干预后举行，本记录不作推断，将跟进会晤结果。本站此前未收录过中国使馆向外国议会发函施压的个案；与本站 10 月 30 日收录的米兰“李老师”案、10 月 30 日收录的云师加拿大诉讼案同属跨境镇压议题的不同形态。[1]
According to Tibet Express on November 6: CTA President (Sikyong) Penpa Tsering arrived in The Hague on November 3 for an official visit to the Netherlands. On November 4, a day after his arrival, the Chinese Embassy in The Hague wrote directly to members of the Dutch Parliament's Committee on Foreign Affairs, expressing concern over his scheduled meeting with the committee. The Embassy urged committee members not to provide Penpa Tsering with a platform, labelling the CTA an unconstitutional 'separatist political organisation' pursuing 'Tibet independence'. The letter maintained that Tibet is strictly an 'internal matter' of China, citing Beijing's infrastructure investments and economic growth while asserting that no country recognises Tibetan independence. Despite Beijing's objections to his parliamentary engagement, the Sikyong continued with his scheduled engagements in The Hague: after arriving on November 3, he met with senior Dutch government officials on religious freedom on November 4 and took part in a media roundtable with local journalists and China commentators, including former correspondent Garrie van Pinxteren. [1]
The visit's diplomatic programme also included a keynote address on November 5 at the sixth annual summit of the Inter-Parliamentary Alliance on China (IPAC), where 52 parliamentarians representing 30 countries gathered. Penpa Tsering reaffirmed the CTA's commitment to the Middle Way Approach, emphasising that pursuing dialogue with Beijing did not diminish Tibet's historical and legal rights; he urged foreign governments to counter China's historical narrative through legislative measures, citing the United States' Resolve Tibet Act, and called for international opposition to Beijing's attempts to assert control over the selection and reincarnation of Tibetan Buddhist spiritual leaders, including the future reincarnation of the 14th Dalai Lama. During his visit he also held bilateral meetings with IPAC Co-Chair Jan Paternotte, Member of the European Parliament Miriam Lexmann, and delegations from Panama, Japan, Taiwan, the United Kingdom, Romania and the Balkans. [1]
Verification note: the sole source for this record is Tibet Express's November 6 report; the embassy letter's full text has not been published and this site has not independently checked the wording of the letter, so the account of its contents follows Tibet Express. While the Dutch Parliament's official schedule listed a meeting between Penpa Tsering and the Committee on Foreign Affairs for November 5, Tibet.net had not, at the time of writing, confirmed whether the meeting took place following the Chinese Embassy's intervention, and this record draws no conclusion on that point; the meeting's outcome will be followed up. This site had not previously carried a case of a Chinese embassy writing to a foreign parliament to press it not to meet a Tibetan leader; it belongs with the October 30 Milan 'Teacher Li' case and the October 30 Gyal Lo case in Canada as a different form of the same transnational-repression theme. [1]
上述链接是所引用报告或文章的原始发布方。其结论已在正文中明确归属，不代表本站独立完成了全部事实认定。Links above point to the original publishers of the cited reports or articles. Their conclusions are attributed in the text and do not imply that this site has independently verified every factual claim.